Virtex-5 FPGA ML561 User Guide www.xilinx.com 91UG199 (v1.2.1) June 15, 2009Summary and RecommendationsRSummary and RecommendationsThe first objective of this exercise is to establish correlation between hardwaremeasurements and the simulation at the probe point. The intention was to validate thesimulation model for the targeted signal. The degree of correlation achieved is looked at interms of absolute difference as well as relative percentage. The relative percentagedifferences are presented in terms of unit interval (UI) for timing characteristics and interms of VREF voltage for the voltage margin characteristics.Correlation simulation is performed under ideal conditions, that is, the stimulus isgenerated without any jitter. On the other hand, the hardware measurements are subject tojitter (which tends to increase ISI), board-level power fluctuation (which can affect the eyeamplitude), and stability of the probing station. Thus some correlation differences areexpected. The user ultimately uses his or her own judgment to account for thesedifferences, and adjusts the values extrapolated for quality of signal at the receiver IOB.Table 7-15 contains this information for all six test signals.There are varying degrees of correlation differences among the six test signals. In general,there is a good match between hardware measurements and the correlation simulation,except for some yet-to-be analyzed differences, for example, DDR2 DIMM Write DVW andQDRII read noise margin.The remainder of this section summarizes the extrapolation results of the data bit interfacefor all six memory operations on the ML561 board. The measure of SI characteristics ofeach signal is determined by the worst-case extrapolation measurement from among thesimulations with drivers at slow-weak and fast-strong corners. The values chosen betweenthese two corner cases are:• Minimum of DVW, noise margin, and overshoot/undershoot margin• Maximum of ISITable 7-15: Summary of Correlation Differences: Hardware vs. SimulationOperation ΔDVW(% UI (1) )ΔISI(% UI)Noise Margin(% VREF)Overshoot /Undershoot Margin(% VREF)DDR2 Component Write 40 ps(2.6%)47 ps(3.2%)98 mV(10.9%)69 mV(7.6%)DDR2 Component Read 0 ps(0%)43 ps(2.9%)6 mV(0.7%)244 mV(17.2%)DDR2 DIMM Write 218 ps(14.5%)366 ps(24.5%)112 mV(12.6%)2 mV(0.3%)DDR2 DIMM Read 39 ps(2.6%)44 ps(2.9%)90 mV(10.0%)208 mV(23.1%)QDRII Write 10 ps(0.6%)107 ps(6.4%)2 mV(0.3%)85 mV(9.4%)QDRII Read 106 ps(6.4%)27 ps(1.6%)386 mV(31.8%)50 mV(5.6%)Notes:1. Unit Interval (UI): 1.5 ns for DDR2 and 1.67 ns for QDRII. VREF = 0.9V for DDR2 and QDRII.